Of course, after reading that quote, I started to think about the fact that all my first crushes were indeed on fictional characters. In third grade, I fell in love with Jo (from Little Women
Pollard-Gott's book ranks the hundred most influential characters in order of their influence. Of course, such a ranking is completely subjective. I promise that some of the characters who most influenced your own life will be missing. Nevertheless, the author's choices are both obvious and inclusive. Her decisions were influenced by not only characters' global popularity but also on the ways they have influenced more contemporary literature and culture.
Since in the last few months, I've spent way too long lately reading about how the characters of the Homeric epics resonate and play across the centuries, I was thrilled to see Odysseus in second place on the influence list. Pollard-Gott recognizes that Odysseus's true battle began only after the Trojan War. His journey to heroism--unlike Achilles's--is to "stay alive and win his homecoming."
Although in Homer's epic Odysseus returns to Ithaca and Penelope, "his numerous admirers through the centuries, both readers and writers, have always wanted to get him on the move again." as Pollard-Gott cleverly says. "His wit, endurance, and resourcefulness are equal to any challenge, but what good is such abundant capability if he is left cocooned in a tranquil home with no dangers to overcome?"
Although his journey is a classic model for literary journeys throughout the following centuries, Odysseus gives us "precious little gist" for readers to understand or identify with the character psychologically. Unlike more contemporary characters, Odyssseus is almost devoid of any internal dialogue of self-reflection. Although this fact may make the character seem one dimensional, it also encourages us to use this man of action to model our modern odysseys on his, on this man of twists and turns who at the same time is always pointing towards home.
Pollard-Gott's insights into Achilles are also fascinating. She points out that he is in many ways the first flawed and tragic hero--and therefore an early model for Hamlet among others. Achilles, the author claims, is a man whose intelligence is clouded by his passion. In opposition, Odysseus clouds (or constrains) his passion through the use of his intelligence.
The author observes that Agamemnon's theft of Achilles's concubine parallels Paris's theft of Helen from Menelaos, Agamemnon's brother. I'd never put these together--but once I read Pollard-Gott's analysis, I can't imagine seeing it any other way.
Pollard-Gott points out that the works of Homer have been of central importance for many years: "Of 1,596 ancient Greek books which archaeologists have found preserved on Egyptian papyri, half were copies of the Iliad or the Odyssey or related commentaries." Astounding.
I have only read a handful of the character essays in The Fictional 100
Highly recommended.
No comments:
Post a Comment